Ads 468x60px

Pages

Saturday, February 26, 2011

10 milliard d’apps téléchargées


Depuis son lancement en 2008, l’App Store et les développeurs d’applications iPhone n’ont eu de cesse de proposer des nouvelles applications pour gérer tout le quotidien, de la lecture des infos, à la recherche de resto en passant par la location de voiture.

Aujourd’hui, la boutique Apple de vente d’applications virtuelles sur iPhone/iPad et iPod touch a atteint le niveau record de 10 milliards de téléchargement. Et pour fêter l’événement, Apple a fait un petit concours.

L’application numéro 10 milliards, Paper Glider, a été téléchargée par Gail Davis de Orpington dans le sud est de la Grande-Bretagne.

En tant que grande gagnante du concours Apple, Gail a gagne un bon d’achat sur iTunes d’une valeur de 10 000 dollars US. Pas si mal pour un Paper Glider ! Le but de cette application gratuite est de faire voler un avion en papier dans un bureau virtuel. Un bon moyen de passer le temps.
10milliards-apps-iphone.jpg

Crowdsourced maps help mobile users compare network reliability


Applications from Open Signal Maps and RootMetrics help smartphone users chart where their phones will and won't work.
Applications from Open Signal Maps and RootMetrics help smartphone users chart where their phones will and won't work.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Company maps of wireless networks can be inaccurate or lacking detail
  • Application designers have turned to crowdsourced data
  • Open Signal maps has an app for Android
  • RootMetrics has an app for iPhone; Android and Blackberry versions coming
Editor's note: Amy Gahran writes about mobile tech for CNN.com. She is a San Francisco Bay Area writer and media consultant whose blog, Contentious.com, explores how people communicate in the online age.
(CNN) -- Mobile devices are only as good as the networks that serve them. But too often, a mobile user will purchase a new smartphone with a two-year carrier contract, only then to learn that the phone gets lousy reception at home, work or school.
That's why the first -- and obvious -- question consumers should ask themselves when considering a mobile phone is this: Which carriers get the best service in the places where I spend most of my time?
The trouble: This isn't always an easy question to answer.
Yes, carriers all provide coverage maps on their websites that show where their networks are supposed to reach -- theoretically, based on cell phone tower locations. But, in reality, signal strength and network speed can vary substantially due to terrain, structures, the typical amount of data-hungry wireless devices on the network in a given location, and other factors.
When looking for a new carrier, some people attempt to gauge the local quality of a network by finding local customers of various carriers and asking them how many signal bars they generally see on their phones. However, this isn't necessarily reliable, since (as I wrote last year) signal bars are largely meaningless, and they're sometimes misleading.
This is where crowdsourcing can help: Mobile users can work together to create crowdsourced maps that show how well wireless networks really perform in specific locations. Here are two projects that you can actually contribute to, by sending data from an app on your smartphone:
This project, by Staircase3, collects data via an Android application. As you are out and about, this application runs in the background, monitoring the signal strength of your carrier's network. If you have data-sharing turned on for the app (you can turn it off), your data are stripped of identifying information and uploaded to Staircase3's servers. Aggregate user data are displayed on maps on the Open Signal Maps site.
I've installed this app on my Droid Incredible, and it's interesting and useful. In addition to showing the direction and location of the tower my phone is connected to, and signal strength, it allows me to conduct network speed tests. This is important because both signal strength and network speed play important roles in the quality of voice calls and data connections.
According to the Open Signal Maps blog, "A high (signal strength) does not guarantee a good connection. You can be communicating really well with the tower but the tower might be choked up -- it might be dealing with so much network data that you get terrible speeds."
Also, being able to easily conduct your own network speed test can indicate whether your carrier might be "throttling" your data connection, as Verizon recently said it will start doing to the top 5% of its customers by data usage.
The coverage maps on the Open Signal Maps site appear to offer data for major and minor carriers in most regions. They don't offer an iPhone app, because of differences in how the iOS operating system captures signal data. A BlackBerry app is under consideration.
This project collects data via an iPhone app. Android and BlackBerry apps are coming, the site says.
The maps on the RootMetrics site allow you to compare the performance of AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile networks. Smaller carriers, such as US Cellular or MetroPCS, are not shown. These maps are a bit simpler to interpret than the Open Signal Maps, and they have user-friendly features. For example, they express network speed as the number of seconds it takes to upload or download a song.
RootMetrics users also can view their own personal map with a history of signal strength and network speed.
Both of these projects are most useful in major metro areas where lots of people use smartphones. They encourage people to use their apps in other locations to help make their maps more complete.
Although people who use feature phones (the next step down from smartphones, used by nearly 75% of U.S. mobile users) cannot run the apps for these projects, the data on these maps still might be useful for selecting a local carrier.
In the big picture, projects like these could help hold carriers accountable for the network speeds they advertise, an issue that's likely to become especially contentious in the next few years as carriers struggle to deliver high-speed wireless broadband to a fast-growing number of data-sucking phones.
As Mashable notes, "Finally, we'd have a source of real-world information to counteract the questionable maps we see from wireless providers."
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Amy Gahran.

WSJ: iPad 2 to be announced on March 2


No official announcement has been made about a next-generation iPad, but a report says Apple will announce the device soon.
No official announcement has been made about a next-generation iPad, but a report says Apple will announce the device soon.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • WSJ reports the new Apple iPad will be announced on March 2 in San Francisco
  • That rumor has not been confirmed by CNN or Apple
(CNN) -- Is the iPad 2 finally coming?
Some Apple fanatics expected the company's second-generation tablet computer to be announced in January.
So far, there's no official news. But All Things Digital's Kara Swisher reported Tuesday that Apple will announce the iPad 2 on March 2.
"To those who intensely care about this kind of stuff -- which would be pretty much everyone in the tech ecosystem -- Apple will hold its much-anticipated event on March 2, where the tech giant seems poised to unveil a new version of its hugely successful iPad, according to multiple sources," Swisher writes on the blog BoomTown, part of the Wall Street Journal's All Things Digital network.
"According to several sources close to the situation, the Wednesday date in a little more than a week is firm and will take place in San Francisco, the scene of many such Apple events," she wrote.
Neither CNN nor Apple has confirmed the March 2 date. We'll keep an eye out for anything official. Press invitations tend to go out in advance of Apple events.
Apple jumped out ahead of the tablet-computer pack by announcing the iPad in January 2010. But the tech giant faces increasing competition from other tablet makers, especially those using Google's Android operating system.

AT&T iPhone beats Verizon in nationwide 3G speed tests


The AT&T iPhone's average download speed was 1,769 Kbps. The Verizon iPhone's average download speed was 848 Kbps.
The AT&T iPhone's average download speed was 1,769 Kbps. The Verizon iPhone's average download speed was 848 Kbps.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Verizon iPhone and AT&T iPhone go head-to-head in broadband tests
  • You should get a Verizon iPhone if you really care about voice quality and calls
  • AT&T iPhone is better as a media-consumption device
(WIRED) -- The Verizon iPhone and AT&T iPhone have gone head-to-head in thousands of broadband tests, and the numbers tell the story you'd expect: AT&T's network is much faster.
Ookla, creators of the Speedtest.net broadband test, compiled data from tests run by iPhone customers using the Speedtest.net app on both AT&T and Verizon.
On average, the reported AT&T iPhone transfer rates were roughly two times faster than the Verizon iPhone's.
The AT&T iPhone's average download speed was 1,769 Kbps, and the average upload speed was 730 Kbps. By way of comparison, the Verizon iPhone's average download speed was 848 Kbps, and the average upload speed was 506 Kbps.
The results come from 43,000 AT&T iPhones and 14,000 Verizon iPhones all over the United States. Most Speedtest.net app users ran the tests multiple times, totaling 106,000 results from AT&T iPhone users and 49,000 results from Verizon iPhone users.
The Speedtest.net results did not provide data on coverage reliability or dropped connections.
From my benchmarking of the Verizon iPhone versus the AT&T iPhone, I also found that the AT&T iPhone's 3G transfer rates were much faster than Verizon's.
However, the AT&T iPhone sometimes could not complete tests because it did not have a connection, whereas the Verizon iPhone successfully completed every test. In short, I found the Verizon iPhone to be slower with network transfers but more reliable with coverage. Reviewers at other publications had the same results.
"I think that's the story I expected to see," said Doug Suttles, co-founder of Ookla. "Verizon has never talked up their speed, but they always talk up coverage and reliability.... I think the story is quality versus throughput: What are you after?"
Speedtest.net's nationwide results back my verdict: You should get a Verizon iPhone if you really care about voice quality and calls, but the AT&T iPhone is better as a media-consumption device (Netflix movies, photo downloads and uploads, etc.) because of its faster speeds.
Subscribe to WIRED magazine for less than $1 an issue and get a FREE GIFT! Click here!
Copyright 2010 Wired.com.

Mobile phones: How to 'keep your brain away from the antenna


Some doctors encourage people to keep phones away from their heads as a way to reduce radiation exposure.
Some doctors encourage people to keep phones away from their heads as a way to reduce radiation exposure.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • New study says cell phones change how brains process sugar
  • The study draws no definitive conclusions about cell phones and brain health
  • But study author still says people should keep heads away from phones
  • CNN offers tips on how to accomplish this, without looking silly
(CNN) -- Ah, the what-do-I-do-about-this frustration of science.
A government-funded study published Tuesday says radiation from mobile phones can change the way brains process sugar.
Is that a big deal? The scientists aren't sure, according to CNN Health's report. But our story has scary tidbits.
Like this quote, from Dr. Nora Volkow, the Journal of the American Medical Association study's lead author and a neuroscientist at theNational Institutes of Health:
"The human brain is sensitive to the electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones, but for the brain to be impacted the cell phone has to be close to the antenna. So keep your brain away from the antenna."
In layman's terms: It's better to be safe than sorry, she says.
Despite years of research, there's still no conclusive proof cell phone radiation causes cancer and other health problems in the brain. Studies, some of them funded by the wireless industry, have produced contradictory findings.
But the nearly ubiquitous devices haven't been proven 100% safe either.
So, for the sake of argument, let's say you are worried about this and you do want to "keep your brain away from the antenna."
How do you actually do that?
Here are a few options, taken from an earlier CNN tip sheet and influenced by another from the Environmental Working Group, an advocacy organization:
Quit talking on the phone
In the age of "can you hear me now," this won't be easy. One workaround , however, is to send text messages instead of calling. Not only will this keep the phone in your hand and away from your brain, it may help you connect with that pint-sized niece of yours who has given up "verbaling" completely.
Wear headphones when you talk
Wearing headphones -- or those Bluetooth headsets -- when you're talking on the phone can cut down on your exposure to mobile phone radiation. The only downsides to this are sociological: It looks weird if you're talking to yourself in public; and tech-savvy friends may judge you for wearing a Bluetooth earpiece.
Buy a phone that emits less
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission sets a radiation threshold that all cell phones sold here must fall below. Industry groups say this level is plenty strict, maybe even too strict. But others say consumers should be informed about how much radiation their phones emit and, if they want, they should be able to purchase a lower-radiation phone.
San Francisco last year started requiring cell phone manufacturers to advertise radiation levels in stores. If you don't happen to live in the Bay Area, however, don't fret. The Environmental Working Group and CNET News both have posted online lists of cell phones and their radiation levels.
General rule of thumb: The smarter the phone, the more radiation.
Use the speaker function
This one is easy to forget. Say you don't have headphones with a built-in microphone and you don't want to buy a geeky Bluetooth headset. The obvious solution: Just use your mobile phone's speakerphone feature.
Bonus tip: This probably works better when you're alone than when you're sharing your conversation with the entire room.
Don't talk as much
Take this as literally as possible. It's not just how long you're on the phone, but how much time you spend talking in a phone conversation that actually contributes to the amount of radiation your phone emits, according to the Environmental Working Group.
Maybe it's a good time to work on some listening skills.